National instruments measurement studio 2013 crack. If we want to talk about clinical optical performance, such as corner sharpness, curvature, and optical performance, I wanted to give another suggestion. I hope you will be very happy with your m10. Sometimes it is referred to leica mystic or magic. However, the summilux has an unique look that is very hard to describe. In terms of contrast, the summicron is definitely more clinical than the summilux. It has the additional benefit of being smaller and pocketable.

I always prefer to take the 35mm summicron instead of the 35mm summilux. Thank you very much in advance! I own both lenses. If someone has experiences with these lenses I would appreciate some advice. What are the major differences apart from speed between the two lenses? Is the contrast of the cron really better than the contrast from the lux? Since the price is not far off (only a few hundred dollars) I'm having a hard time deciding between the two.

For the 35mm I see two options a new 35 Summicron asph or a used 35 Summilux asph. I quite like 50 but find it that bit too narrow at times, that's why I'm opting for a 35mm. I already own a fast 50mm (M) lens but along with the M10 I want to get a 35mm lens as a walk around (street, family, occasional landscape). I'm buying this camera as my daily walk around camera, since I already have a Canon 5D with all ranges covered but find that camera too bulky to take with me all the time. Hi, I'm lucky enough to be buying my first Leica M (the brand new M10) this upcoming week. Discussion in 'Leica and Rangefinders' started by fredus. The cosmetics are very nice, but there is a slight irregularity on the front of the mount. LEITZ LEICA SUMMICRON 5cm 50mm F2 50/2 Rigid DR M Mount Lens - $588.00.

50mm summilux serial numbers